Skip to main content
← All metrics

Nut intake and the risk of dying

People who ate more nuts had a lower risk of dying, with most of the association already present at a fairly modest amount.

Where you stand

Aune 2016 is the dose-response meta-analysis behind that curve. Peanut butter did not show the same association in one cohort, even though whole peanuts did.

Each row is one study of death risk from nut intake. The bright line is what that study found. The band around it is the range the data still supports — it fades where the evidence thins. Left of the centre line is lower risk.

what the study foundstill plausibleno change
Two groups compared
the whole gap between a high and a low
high vs low nut consumption
Chen GC, Zhang R, Martínez-González MA, Zhang ZL, Bonaccio M, van Dam RM, Qin LQ. 2017
19% lower
range 16–22% lower
≥7 servings/week vs non-consumers
Bao Y, Han J, Hu FB, Giovannucci EL, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Fuchs CS. 2013
20% lower
range 14–27% lower
≥10 g/day vs non-consumers
van den Brandt PA, Schouten LJ. 2015
23% lower
range 11–34% lower
One step at a time
what each single increase is worth
per 28 g/day nut intake
Aune D, Keum N, Giovannucci E, Fadnes LT, Boffetta P, Greenwood DC, Tonstad S, Vatten LJ, Riboli E, Norat T. 2016
22% lower
range 16–28% lower

What it is

How many servings of nuts you eat in a typical week — a small handful counts as one serving. This is nuts, not peanut butter; one study on this page found peanut butter did not carry the same association even though peanuts themselves did.

How it is modeled (not scored)

Technical notes

The curve is Aune 2016: dose-response meta-analysis, 20 studies. Per 28 g/day (about a small handful) increase in nut intake, all-cause mortality RR 0.78 (0.72–0.84). Main source: Aune. Supporting: Chen 2017 (18 studies, 81,034 deaths, highest-vs-lowest RR 0.81 (0.78–0.84), risk levels off around 3 servings/week) / Grosso 2015 (a smaller, steeper pool of only 7 studies, one-serving/day RR 0.73 (0.60–0.88), and authors flag that nut eaters also tend to smoke less and eat more fruit and vegetables — confounding cannot be excluded) / Bao 2013 (Nurses' Health Study + Health Professionals Follow-up Study, 27,429 deaths; a monotonic frequency-response with no plateau in this cohort, HR 0.80 (0.73–0.86) at ≥7 servings/week, funded in part by a nut-industry group, disclosed by the authors). van den Brandt 2015 corroborates the plateau shape and is the source for the peanut-butter gap.

How to improve it

  • Add a small daily handful of nuts (about 1 oz / 28 g)
  • Choose whole nuts over peanut butter
  • Swap nuts in for a less healthy daily snack
  • Either tree nuts or peanuts were associated with lower risk — no single type is required

Sources

5 cited
  1. Aune D, Keum N, Giovannucci E, Fadnes LT, Boffetta P, Greenwood DC, Tonstad S, Vatten LJ, Riboli E, Norat T. (2016) — BMC Medicine
    Nut consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer, all-cause and cause-specific mortality: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies
    View source
  2. Chen GC, Zhang R, Martínez-González MA, Zhang ZL, Bonaccio M, van Dam RM, Qin LQ. (2017) — Food & Function
    Nut consumption in relation to all-cause and cause-specific mortality: a meta-analysis 18 prospective studies
    View source
  3. Grosso G, Yang J, Marventano S, Micek A, Galvano F, Kales SN. (2015) — American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
    Nut consumption on all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies
    View source
  4. Bao Y, Han J, Hu FB, Giovannucci EL, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Fuchs CS. (2013) — New England Journal of Medicine
    Association of nut consumption with total and cause-specific mortality
    View source
  5. van den Brandt PA, Schouten LJ. (2015) — International Journal of Epidemiology
    Relationship of tree nut, peanut and peanut butter intake with total and cause-specific mortality: a cohort study and meta-analysis
    View source

Not part of your score
Nut Intake is tracked here for its research. It does not count toward the 8-marker MarkerScore. See what does in the calculator.
Open calculator

Educational content only — not medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Not a medical device; not FDA evaluated. Consult a qualified healthcare professional about your own health, and call emergency services for urgent symptoms. Full medical disclaimer →